Skip to main content
EPCGuide

EPC Rankings by Parliamentary Constituency

60.8% of homes in Cambridge fail the 2030 EPC minimum. Is your MP's patch doing any better? Original analysis of 121,724 properties across 25 constituencies.

121,724 properties analysed25 constituencies370,249.2 tonnes CO2/year

60.8%

Worst: Cambridge

below EPC C minimum

19.7%

Best: Brent Central

below EPC C minimum

38.6%

National Average

across all constituencies

370k

Tonnes CO2/Year

across all 25 areas

The 2030 EPC C deadline is closing in

In Cambridge, 60.8% of homes in our sample currently fail the proposed 2030 EPC C minimum standard. That is 41.1 percentage points worse than the best-performing constituency in this analysis (Brent Central at 19.7%). Across all 25 constituencies, 38.6% of properties need upgrades before 2030.

Full Constituency Rankings

# ConstituencyBelow C % ^
1
Cambridge
East of England
60.8%
2
Manchester Gorton
North West
56.8%
3
Nottingham East
East Midlands
52.6%
4
Liverpool Walton
North West
49.8%
5
Camberwell and Peckham
London
47.2%
6
Lancaster and Fleetwood
North West
44.1%
7
Bristol East
South West
41.9%
8
Chester
North West
41%
9
Middlesbrough
North East
40.8%
10
Bradford West
Yorkshire
40.7%
11
Norwich South
East of England
38.6%
12
Bristol West
South West
38.2%
13
Leeds Central
Yorkshire
38.1%
14
Blackpool South
North West
37.1%
15
Birmingham Ladywood
West Midlands
37%
16
Durham North
North East
34.7%
17
Westminster
London
33.8%
18
Manchester Central
North West
33.2%
19
Sheffield Central
Yorkshire
32.9%
20
Hackney North
London
32.6%
21
Leeds West
Yorkshire
31.1%
22
Brighton Pavilion
South East
30.2%
23
Kensington
London
27.9%
24
Holborn and St Pancras
London
22.8%
25
Brent Central
London
19.7%

Click any row to expand full data. Sort by any column header.

The Compliance Gap

The gap between the best and worst performing constituencies reveals a stark postcode lottery. Homes in the worst areas face upgrade costs, carbon emissions and energy bills far exceeding those in the best.

5 Worst Constituencies

Cambridge60.8%

3,042 properties below C

Manchester Gorton56.8%

2,838 properties below C

Nottingham East52.6%

2,630 properties below C

Liverpool Walton49.8%

2,489 properties below C

Camberwell and Peckham47.2%

2,362 properties below C

5 Best Constituencies

Brent Central19.7%

987 properties below C

Holborn and St Pancras22.8%

1,140 properties below C

Kensington27.9%

1,397 properties below C

Brighton Pavilion30.2%

1,511 properties below C

Leeds West31.1%

1,554 properties below C

The gap is 41.1 percentage points. A home in Cambridge is 3.1x more likely to fail the 2030 minimum than one in Brent Central. This is not just an environmental issue: landlords in the worst-performing constituencies face the greatest compliance costs and legal risk.

Private Rental Hotspots

These constituencies combine high levels of private renting with poor EPC scores. Landlords here face the greatest compliance pressure: more properties to upgrade, and greater likelihood of enforcement action after 2030.

Cambridge

East of England

60.8%

below EPC C

18.5%

private rental

3,042 properties need upgrades. Avg SAP: 65.1

Bristol West

South West

38.2%

below EPC C

37.4%

private rental

1,910 properties need upgrades. Avg SAP: 70.2

Manchester Gorton

North West

56.8%

below EPC C

15.6%

private rental

2,838 properties need upgrades. Avg SAP: 65.5

Sheffield Central

Yorkshire

32.9%

below EPC C

38.5%

private rental

1,643 properties need upgrades. Avg SAP: 71.4

Brighton Pavilion

South East

30.2%

below EPC C

38.7%

private rental

1,511 properties need upgrades. Avg SAP: 71.1

Chester

North West

41%

below EPC C

27.3%

private rental

2,051 properties need upgrades. Avg SAP: 68.8

Share Your Constituency's Data

Dark gradient cards designed for screenshots and social posts. Copy the text to share on Twitter/X, LinkedIn, or email your MP.

East of England

Rank #1

Cambridge

60.8%

of homes fail EPC C minimum

SAP Score

65.1

CO2/yr

17.5kt

Private Rental

18.5%

EPCGuide.co.uk - 2026 Data

Yorkshire

Rank #13

Leeds Central

38.1%

of homes fail EPC C minimum

SAP Score

69.6

CO2/yr

11.3kt

Private Rental

17.9%

EPCGuide.co.uk - 2026 Data

London

Rank #25

Brent Central

19.7%

of homes fail EPC C minimum

SAP Score

74.8

CO2/yr

9.2kt

Private Rental

34.9%

EPCGuide.co.uk - 2026 Data

Methodology and Data Notes

Data sourced from the official UK Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) register via the Open Data Communities API, operated by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. This analysis covers up to 5,000 of the most recently lodged certificates per constituency, filtered by Parliamentary constituency code.

Below-C definition: Properties rated D, E, F, or G. Under the proposed 2030 MEES regulations, private rented properties will require a minimum EPC C rating. Properties below this threshold will be unlawful to let without a valid exemption.

Solid wall: Properties where the walls description contains "solid" but not "insulated" or "filled cavity". These properties typically require external or internal wall insulation to reach EPC C.

Private rental: Properties where tenure is recorded as "Rented (private)" at time of EPC assessment. Note: many EPCs are commissioned for sales, so this figure reflects the assessed sample composition.

SAP score: Standard Assessment Procedure score (1 to 100). Higher is better. Ratings: A=92+, B=81-91, C=69-80, D=55-68, E=39-54, F=21-38, G=1-20.

Coverage: This analysis covers 25 Parliamentary constituencies selected to represent a diverse mix of urban and rural areas, regions, and socioeconomic profiles. It is not a nationally representative sample. Data current as of March 2026.